NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 May 2024 17:57:27 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
On 30/05/2024 16:03, Ken Herman wrote:
> Can you clarify what’s behind the need for this? 

Basically a couple of cases where some constituencies haven't been happy
with the consensus result achieved in a working group, so they block it
in Council. Unfortunately it works both ways, but I don't think trying
to force the council to always agree with WG recommendations is the
solution - what is needed is some sort of "provide good justification
to disagreeing".

	Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2