Thank you Rafik - much appreciated!
Julf
On 15/02/2023 04:04, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> sharing below the update I drafted regarding the GGP working group .
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> De : *Rafik Dammak* <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> Date: mer. 15 févr. 2023 à 12:03
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] GGP Applicant Support Subject Matter Expert
> Input Request
> To: Kathy Kleiman <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> Cc: <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>
>
> Hi Kathy,
>
> Thanks for the questions.
> The working started discussion last December, meeting biweekly, and we
> are tasked basically to work on the measures for success and metrics for
> the applicant support program. We started first to review the tasks
> given by GNSO council in the initiation request for GGP, the relevant
> material like the applicant support recommendations report, relevant
> part of subpro final report and the implementation review report of the
> applicant support program. We have already delivert to the GNSO council
> the project plan and timeline .
> We are currently giving input/comment on the format and listing possible
> metrics following the applicant support program lifecycle element like
> outreach, submission or delegation. Discussion is moving slowly but
> starting to get its pace.
>
> We also had some presentations from the ICANN GDS division (Global
> Domains & Strategy) as they were responsible of implementation, about
> learnings from the applicant support program in the previous new gTLD
> round and also about the ODA (Operational Design Phase) for new subpro
> recommendations. It is acknowledged that the ICANN board will likely
> make decisions based on the ODA report for subpro before GGP
> delivers its recommendations. However, the GNSO council will submit the
> GGP recommendations report when it's done and approved to the ICANN
> board for consideration.
>
> sharing here the tasks requested to the GGP working group for reference:
>
> /Task 3 – Analyze the set of suggested metrics in Implementation
> Guidance 17.9
> and propose which ones should be prioritized. The set of prioritized
> metrics is
> NOT limited to what is identified in 17.9
> Task 4 – Identify any other appropriate metrics and measures of
> success to help
> in identifying the necessary program elements and measuring program success
> after the fact. In identifying the suggested set of metrics, propose how
> data can be
> collected, how metrics can be measured, who can collect the data, as
> well as what
> represents success.
> Task 5 – Consider, and to the extent feasible, suggest how the “outreach,
> education, business case development, and application evaluation”
> elements of
> the Applicant Support Program may be impacted by the identified metrics and
> measures of success. For example, based on the success metrics for Awareness
> and Education, this may impact the approach for performing outreach and
> education. To the extent feasible, suggest an approach to outreach,
> education,
> business case development, and application evaluation assistance.
> /
>
>
> happy to answer further questions.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le mar. 14 févr. 2023 à 22:05, Kathy Kleiman <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> a écrit :
>
> Tx Rafik for doing this. Can you tell us what is happening on this
> important group?
>
> Best, Kathy
>
> On 2/14/2023 2:34 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> For information, I am the NCSG representative to the GGP applicant
>> support working group.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le mar. 14 févr. 2023 à 15:24, Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> a écrit :
>>
>> Dear NCUC members,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:49 PM Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear NCUC members,
>>
>> On behalf of Mike Silber, GGP Working Group Chair, please
>> find below the GGP Applicant Support Subject Matter Expert
>> Input Request
>>
>>
>> As you may recall, the GNSO Council has approved
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+2022-08-25><https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+2022-08-25>the GNSO Guidance Process (GGP) Initiation Request <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2022/draft/draft-subpro-ggp-initiation-request-clean-24aug22-en.pdf> to perform work on Applicant Support. The GGP Working Group is beginning its work with Task 2: “identify experts with expertise to aid in tasks 3, 4, and 5” (see pages 3-5 of the Initiation Request). The GGP Initiation Request envisioned that the Working Group has the flexibility/discretion to rely on the advice of Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) in specific fields to aid in deliberations for certain tasks pertaining to Task 3, 4, and 5 as detailed in the Initiation Request. But the Initiation Request also listed related experience and skills GGP Working Group members should have, suggesting a possible overlap between GGP members and SMEs. Thus, it may be that your organization has already appointed members to the GGP Working Group that you consider SMEs based on this guidance from the Initiation Request:
>>
>> /
>> /
>>
>> /Organizations are encouraged to appoint individuals with
>> skills, knowledge and experience pertinent to forming an
>> effective Applicant Support Program. Council will provide
>> guidance on the aggregated skill set that is needed for
>> the group (for example: grant and reviewing, regional DNS
>> participation, DNS marketplace economics, cost-benefit
>> analyses, TLD operations, DNS cybersecurity, and TLD
>> investment)./
>>
>>
>>
>> The GGP hereby requests that, if applicable, your
>> organization suggest SMEs by responding to
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>. If your
>> organization is participating in the GGP and your
>> representative member is already an SME please also let us
>> know. If you are not participating in the GGP and not
>> suggesting SMEs it would be very helpful if you could
>> respond accordingly.
>>
>>
>> Kindly reply to this email if you are a subject matter
>> expert willing to join the WG.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Benjamin
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> <https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss <https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> <https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>
|
