Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:21:00 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks Rafik,
I would like to hear from some of the NCSG members who have completed
the survey. I found it poorly structured. At the trivial level, if
one had reservations about a statement, neither supporting nor
opposing it, the only option was "No Opinion", where one might have a
strong opinion about the mechanism within the statement, but no way,
no text box, to express that opinion.
At a minimum, such survey instruments usually have text boxes for
comments, or at least a final text box so that respondents can have
their say about issues missed, or questions that required comments. I
hope that ICANN can do better next time.
Sam Lanfranco
Quoting Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> The third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) has
> published a survey for SO/AC and community asking for input.
>
< rest deleted>
|
|
|