NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 May 2023 18:33:46 +0200
Reply-To:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
From:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
On 29/05/2023 17:54, Judith Hellerstein wrote:

> I am coming late to this discussion but it was not just the meetings 
> that were missed during the NomCom Review but also the important 
> meetings afterwards that led to the Board and others pulling 
> recommendation 10 from the Public Comment. 

Were these council meetings, or some private meetings?

	Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2