Thank you for the clarification, Caleb!

	Julf


On 05/06/2024 20:45, Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele wrote:
> Hi Julf,
> 
> The board did not remove any recommendations. A vote was put forward in 
> the NomCom RIWG from what I understand and we did not have an NCSG rep 
> on the ground during that meeting the recommendation votes were maded to 
> push for a consensus to retain recommendation 10l
> 
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 1:30 PM Johan Helsingius via Ncuc-discuss 
> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> 
>     Thank you for the useful information, Remmy,
> 
>      > The final recommendations were made including our desire to
>     increase and
>      > re-balance the slots and were submitted to the ICANN board and it
>     did
>      > not sail through as expected. (Raoul Plommer can also add a voice
>     here)
> 
>     I am, like Pedro, a bit confused about this - did the team actually
>     recommend re-balancing, but the board removed it, or did the team
>     decide to remove the recommendation from the final version that
>     went to the board?
> 
>      > On the call for term duration, I would advise that current
>     appointees
>      > have 1 additional year, since that would mean they are not
>     returning and
>      > must have availed some ‘knowledge transfer’ on the new or incoming
>      > appointees before their final exit thereafter.
> 
>     That would be the sensible thing to do, yes, but that doesn't seem
>     to be what the recommendation says.
> 
>              Julf
>     _______________________________________________
>     Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>     [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>     https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>     <https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Caleb Ogundele*
> Email: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>