Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:48:03 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thank you for the clarification, Caleb!
Julf
On 05/06/2024 20:45, Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele wrote:
> Hi Julf,
>
> The board did not remove any recommendations. A vote was put forward in
> the NomCom RIWG from what I understand and we did not have an NCSG rep
> on the ground during that meeting the recommendation votes were maded to
> push for a consensus to retain recommendation 10l
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 1:30 PM Johan Helsingius via Ncuc-discuss
> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the useful information, Remmy,
>
> > The final recommendations were made including our desire to
> increase and
> > re-balance the slots and were submitted to the ICANN board and it
> did
> > not sail through as expected. (Raoul Plommer can also add a voice
> here)
>
> I am, like Pedro, a bit confused about this - did the team actually
> recommend re-balancing, but the board removed it, or did the team
> decide to remove the recommendation from the final version that
> went to the board?
>
> > On the call for term duration, I would advise that current
> appointees
> > have 1 additional year, since that would mean they are not
> returning and
> > must have availed some ‘knowledge transfer’ on the new or incoming
> > appointees before their final exit thereafter.
>
> That would be the sensible thing to do, yes, but that doesn't seem
> to be what the recommendation says.
>
> Julf
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> <https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>
>
>
> --
> *Caleb Ogundele*
> Email: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
|
|
|