NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G.
Date:
Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:57:28 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
@Milton +1


Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 20 Apr 2016, at 10:42, Mueller, Milton L wrote:

> I agree, NCUC/NCSG are appropriate vehicles for publicizing these 
> initiatives among civil society organizations/individuals, and many of 
> its members may be interested in joining in, but #Internet4All does 
> not seem to be a domain name policy issue and I think we had better 
> stick to our basic mission.
>
> --MM
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf 
>> Of
>> James Gannon
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:26 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign
>>
>> Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure 
>> related
>> campaign.
>>
>> Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this 
>> may be
>> more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to
>> endorse?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl 
>> Gutiérrez G."
>> <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also 
>>> be
>>> part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion.
>>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2