NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:05:29 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:

Hello, all
I've gotten some feedback from external stakeholders on our statement. 
This made it clear to me that the section on "policy issues" is something of a distraction to what our main point needs to be at this time. People who agree or disagree with those points tend to get stuck in that and lose sight of the recommendations, especially the all-important one that we need to have a policy process. Once we have a real policy process, we can debate and discuss the policy issues and take positions as NCUC; but it is needless to do that now. 

For that reason I offer this modified, and I hope final version, which simply eliminates the section formerly headlines as "Policy issues" and emphasizes the need to treat this as a policy issue and move the PDP process forward in the GNSO.

<word doc attached>

Milton Mueller
Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology
------------------------------
Internet Governance Project:
http://internetgovernance.org


ATOM RSS1 RSS2