NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ermanno Pietrosemoli <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ermanno Pietrosemoli <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 31 Oct 2003 07:50:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
I suppport these nominations
----- Original Message -----
From: Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] WHOIS taskforce nominations


> I agree.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
>
> At 1:43 PM -0500 10/30/03, Milton Mueller wrote:
> >Under our new charter, our new Council representatives,
> >as Chairs of the Policy Committee, should initiate the process
> >of assigning NCUC members to Council Task Forces.
> >
> >Since our election will take place during this crucial 10
> >day period, I think we have to act now, using the old Council
> >and Adcom members (me, Chun, and possibly Gabriel).
> >
> >So I would put forward the following nominations for
> >the three task forces:
> >
> >Task Force 1: Data Mining
> >Milton Mueller
> >
> >Task Force 2: Data Collection and Privacy
> >Kathy Kleiman
> >
> >Task Force 3: Data Accuracy
> >Fran Wellings, EPIC
> >
> >Reason for these nominations:
> >The Task Force 1 will move very fast. Since I was on the
> >Whois Steering Committee I will be up to speed and
> >ready to go. Task Force 2 is the most important one.
> >Kathy Kleiman has been working on that since the
> >decision to send her to Tunisia, so I hope she is
> >willing to continue. Task Force 3 involves issues
> >that EPIC has expertise in.
>
>
> --

ATOM RSS1 RSS2