NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ron Wickersham <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ron Wickersham <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:02:45 -0700
Content-Type:
MULTIPART/MIXED
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (2930 bytes)
I also support Milton's final words and appreciate the effort and skill at
incorporating the various positions expressed on the list.

-ron

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Marilia Maciel wrote:

> Thank you very much for the elegant solution, Milton. Although I preferred
> the previous version, I can also support the current one and the document.
> Best wishes,
> MarĂ­lia
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I too endorse the language as it now reads.
>>
>> Sam L.
>>
>> Quoting "Mueller, Milton L" <[log in to unmask]>:
>>
>>> OK, I have made some minor modifications based on these
>>> discussions, the only significant one related to human rights. The
>>> new language reads:
>>>
>>> The CCWG solicits comments on two different ways of formulating
>>> ICANN's commitment to human rights. Option one expressed ICANN's
>>> commitment "to respect the fundamental human rights of the exercise
>>> of free expression and the free flow of information." Option 2
>>> expressed ICANN's commitment more broadly, "Within its mission and
>>> in its operations, ICANN will be committed to respect
>>> internationally recognized fundamental human rights."
>>>
>>> With one member organization exception, NCSG tends toward support
>>> for the second, more general formulation. The first formulation is
>>> too limited because other human rights, such as privacy, are
>>> relevant to ICANN policies. We do, however, recognize that a
>>> generic reference to human rights might not work as effectively as
>>> more specific requirements, and that freedom of expression and
>>> privacy are two human rights most directly relevant to ICANN's
>>> policy activity. Our preference, therefore, would be to formulate
>>> the commitment this way:
>>>
>>> "Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will be committed
>>> to respect internationally recognized fundamental human rights, in
>>> particular freedom of expression and privacy."
>>>
>>> I hope the policy committee can approve the whole document and get
>>> it submitted to the CCWG public comment period tomorrow.
>>>
>>> --MM
>>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
>>  in an unjust state" -Confucius
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
>> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
>> email: [log in to unmask]   Skype: slanfranco
>> blog:  http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
>> Phone: 613 476-0429 cell: 416-816-2852
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> *MarĂ­lia Maciel*
> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
> School
> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>
> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
> Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" -
> http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2