NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:33:58 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
+1

-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:57:01 -0700
Subject: Re: [] Draft Agenda Meeting Monday 28 July 2014, 13.00 UTC - CWG on IST

> One suggestion on this draft charter, can we please add the word
> "transparency" as a principle by which the working group will work? 
> (shown in red below)
> 
> Thank you!
> Robin
> =========
> Principles
>  In addition to the principles identified by NTIA to guide development
> of a transition proposal, the Cross Community Working Group to Develop
> an IANA Stewardship Transfer (CWG) will adhere to the following
> additional principles: openness; diversity; global participation;
> involvement of affected parties; transparency, and bottom-up,
> consensus-based decision-making.
> 
> ========
> 
> On Jul 26, 2014, at 5:55 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Will check on it.
> > 
> > avri
> > 
> > On 26-Jul-14 06:32, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> >> Avri:
> >> I am wondering who made this summary? Two of the bullet points seem
> incorrect to me:
> >> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> 
> >>> *Annex A Meeting notes and action items DT meeting 21 July* 
> >>> 
> >>> * ICG timeline is still tentative and will need to be further
> >>>   discussed and considered by ICG - issues such as public comment
> and
> >>>   consultation has not been factored in
> >> 
> >> Not true. Public comment has been factored in to the final proposal
> (see the draft charter) and consultation should be going on from day
> one. 
> >> 
> >>>   competing proposals according to charter
> >>> * Draft timeline does not allow for resolution of possible issues
> or
> >>>   testing, incl. no transition window
> >> 
> >> Draft timeline explicitly mentions testing. 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2