NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:06:48 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> That process was developed over a year ago, and based on the (false) premise that the new Stakeholder Groups would be organized around Constituencies like the old GNSO, with a new layer of organization (SGs) added on because (staff assumed) we all have nothing better to do than devote 100% of our time to ICANN organizational antics. No.
>

I believe the role of staff on the decisions infrastructure needs to
be put under the microscope with a view to making them accountable to
their actions and perform their duties as are paid to. In any case, we
are the volunteers they are not While appreciating commercial
stakeholders volunteers, we acknowledge that a fair number of them do
so as part of their jobs?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2