NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Andrew A. Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Andrew A. Adams
Date:
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:32:04 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Milton wrote:
> ICANN actually doesn't control the root servers, which are somewhat autonomously run by various entities around the world.
> Actually it (with oversight from the US Dept of commerce) manages the contents of the root zone file. 
> Those contents are then distributed by the root servers. 
> As Jorge suggests, it is the need for coordinated uniqueness in top level names that creates the centralization. 
> As you noted, ICANN, DoC and others exploit this need for coordination to impose political and regulatory controls on the DNS. 
> It is possible, as I and others have argued, to have multiple roots, not centrally coordinated, but this also raises the risk of some incompatibilities. 

However, ICANN's and the DoC's reach are reined in somewhat by the knowledge 
that technically there is still nothing to prevent the world turning its back 
on them and redirecting to an alternative system. This is why country-code 
delegations for example have rarely been forcibly changed by ICANN even where 
existing delegates refuse to kowtow. If they seriously overstep the consensus 
of their power, they run the risk of outright rebellion. An issue like COICA 
could for example push the issue too far and have the non-US root controllers 
abandon ICANN and set up an alternative system. The IP address number 
assignment system is in fact more of a technical barrier should ICANN try to 
impose its will. This issue is only now getting the attention it needs due to 
the IPv4-6 issue. In the end, the Internet as currently constituted is a 
single consensus reality that holds sway because so far the consensus is 
preferable to the chaos that might ensue. If the consensus becomes more of a 
problem than the chaos, ICANN could fail and fall.

I heartily recommend Milton's book Ruling the Root, by the way, for anyone 
getting involved in this area. It gives you the basic background politically 
and technically to understand the situation. It's a little old now but it 
covers how we got to the current settlement which has more or less remained 
for the last nine years.

-- 
Professor Andrew A Adams                      [log in to unmask]
Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration,  and
Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan       http://www.a-cubed.info/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2