NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:29:14 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Does the NCSG EC support this position, and if so may I see a statement of such from the EC, as they run the election not the Chair.

-James

-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tapani Tarvainen
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 7:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: EC must meet as a whole

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 03:56:45PM +0000, Mueller, Milton L ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

> If the appeal is not resolved, the entire election will be thrown out

That is not true. The appeal will of course be resolved one way or another, but invalidating the election would need a new, separate process.

Likewise, this will inevitably lead to the establishment of proper, well-defined procedures for next election, possibly also charter reform.

And that is good.

But as it is, election is ongoing.

Some people would like to change the ballot mid-election.

An appeal has been filed and will be processed in due course as described in our charter.

But that is no reason to stop the election now.

Just vote.

--
Tapani Tarvainen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2