NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:02:28 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Raul,


On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Raul Echeberria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
> Carlos:
>
> I agree with you that the President Rousseff position is of course not based on the Montevideo statement. It should be very very arrogant to think that.

as well as not physically possible (unless you had a time machine).

My point to Carlos and MG was that the T&A are taking the lead on this
in the spirit of "continuing cooperation".

My reaction was also motivated by Jeremy saying;

"It also neutralises the effect of the old guard of the technical
community (ISOC mainly) at the Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation."

Which is 180 degrees different from my analysis. It seems to me that
ISOC and the other Montevideo signatories are stronger in the WGEC
becasue of these 2 events.

Would it be possible to disclose if the Summit was discussed in Montevideo?

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2