NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:23:39 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I agree - Non-Commercial means non-commercial. So the for profit can go 
somewhere else.

On 10/10/2012 8:42 PM, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
> ICANN's Silo model indeed produces a problem for this group. I think what
> they really need to do is split themselves for the purposes of ICANN formal
> structures into two groups: "non-profit Public Internet Access" and
> "Cyber-cafes and other commercial shared computer access providers", apply
> for NCSG/CSG group membership but agree amongst themselves that they will
> coordinate strongly between them on promoting the clear common interests such
> a group has.
>
> I'm afraid I could not support the inclusion of for-profit access providers
> in an NCSG constituency as it violates the non-commercial principle of SG
> membership.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2