NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:21:19 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
At 3:51 PM -0800 19/1/10, Robin Gross wrote:
>Thanks for sending this draft council letter around.  It is very 
>good except I do not agree that the review groups should operate 
>under Chatham House Rules on confidentiality.  It would certainly be 
>a step backward for a group that is to assess the openness and 
>transparency of ICANN to operate in this secret fashion and contrary 
>to ICANN's promises of openness and transparency.  Everything else 
>in the letter looks good however.

	I am going to agree with Brenden on Chatham House rules being 
valuable. I think a review team needs to be able to raise a wide 
range of concerns without worrying about it reflecting on them 
personally, and I think Chatham House rules enable a wider range of 
discussion of the issues than might otherwise occur if individual 
participant comments were made public.
	Regards
		David

ATOM RSS1 RSS2