NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carlos Afonso <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Carlos Afonso <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:09:41 -0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Near consensus? Several members did not express their positions in this 
list. In any case, you can say it represents the position of a majority 
of the ones who did participate.

NCUC is not very participative these days -- I still need help on the 
GNSO constituency questionnaire, and no one replied so far (since 
Dec.19, 2005).

--c.a.

Mawaki Chango wrote:

>Dear Olof,
>
>Kindly find attached the above metioned statement that I wish to
>submit to the GNSO on behalf of the NCUC.
>
>Please note that it is _nearly_ a consensus position, failing one
>voice. In any case, this is the aproved result by an overwhelming
>majority from our discussions on the topic.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Mawaki
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2