NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 May 2012 15:09:48 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
On 17/05/2012, at 1:42 PM, Horacio T. Cadiz wrote:

> On 05/16/2012 08:43 AM, David Cake wrote:
>> I've suggested previously that the only reason alternate roots have
> >failed in the past is that none of them have got significant user
>> share, and that Pirate bay/The Pirate party is one of the few groups
>> that could probably provide impetus for a significant uptake.
> 
>  Why do you think Pirate Bay would gain more traction than
> the other alternate roots? What makes them different from
> AlterNIC and the like?

	A very small percentage of the population care about DNS, and even know what AlterNIC is.
	A much larger percentage of the population care about access to pirated media, and know what Pirate Bay is.
	Or to put it another way - does anyone think it likely that AlterNIC, or other alternate roots, would ever have their own political party, that actually gets members elected in several countries? 
	Cheers
		David
	

ATOM RSS1 RSS2