NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Konstantinos Komaitis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantinos Komaitis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:52:15 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Thanks for the update Carlos.

KK


On 12/03/2010 08:19, "Carlos A. Afonso" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Just now -- Icann board votes against EOI. Back to the drawing board.
> 
> --c.a.
> 
> Konstantinos Komaitis wrote:
>> I would also add to that (and apologies for coming in late) - there are
>> serious trademarks concerns that have not been really expressed. Like for
>> instance, will Time Warner be able to take .time? There needs to be some
>> form of legitimate restrictions as applied in trademark law.
>> 
>> Konstantinos
>> 
>> 
>> On 09/03/2010 14:06, "Wendy Seltzer" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>>> Hi, it would be nice to know more about what the rationale for this
>>>> position
>>>> is. Not that I oppose it, it's just that the EoI proposal has been kicking
>>>> around since October and no one here has expressed any positions on it or
>>>> interest in it. Obviously you had a discussed there, please let us know
>>>> what
>>>> you mean by a "pre-launch application" and I'd especially like to know how
>>>> you respond to one of the arguments I have heard in favor of the EoI
>>>> proposal:
>>>> - it provides information about what is really out there, thus providing a
>>>> counter to GAC and TM-lobby promoted FUD about all the problems a new TLD
>>>> round is likely to cause
>>> When the EoI becomes a mandatory declaration of intent to participate,
>>> combined with a serious financial commitment, without greater clarity of
>>> process from the ICANN side, it seems unfair to many who would like to
>>> participate.  I'd rather channel that energy back into advancement of
>>> the actual gTLD introduction.
>>> 
>>> --Wendy
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [[log in to unmask]] On
>>>> Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer [[log in to unmask]]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 7:27 AM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCSG statement on the EoI
>>>> 
>>>> The assembled NCSG in Nairobi agreed to endorse this statement regarding
>>>> Expressions of Interest:
>>>> 
>>>> As it has been described here, the "Expression of Interest" is in fact a
>>>> "Pre-Launch Application" before ICANN is willing to make contractual
>>>> promises. The NCSG does not support a Pre-Launch Application under these
>>>> circumstances.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>> 

-- 
Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
Lecturer in Law,
GigaNet Membership Chair,
University of Strathclyde,
The Lord Hope Building,
141 St. James Road,
Glasgow, G4 0LT,
UK
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
email: [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2