NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Grigori Saghyan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Grigori Saghyan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:16:58 +0400
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (3183 bytes) , signature.asc (563 bytes)
Hi, Arvi,
it will depend on the policy of the new gTLD registry.
Grigori Saghyan
ISOC.AM


On 29.04.2013 23:03, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Assuming they are doing this because of law, can we say that for countries where the ccTLDs protect individual registrant's privacy rights (so far: .ca, .fr, .se) we could assume that Registrars domiciled in those countries could be expected to follow the same rules with regard to all existing gTLD registrations?
> 
> Seems like it should be hard to argue against the the proposition: Thick Whois robs registrants of their Privacy Rights.  
> 
> 
> avri
> 
> On 29 Apr 2013, at 13:38, Tamir Israel wrote:
> 
>> Same for CIRA the .CA registrar: individual registrants can remain anonymous.
>>
>> Best,
>> Tamir
>>
>> On 4/26/2013 6:57 PM, marie-laure Lemineur wrote:
>>> Avri,
>>>
>>> Same goes for the french registry DOTFR....anonymity is applied by default when the data belongs to an individual registrants....
>>>
>>> When you think that Afnic in its April report announced that 40% of the .FR domains are owned by individuals.....and that one in every two domain names is filed by an individual...
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Marie-laure
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Balleste, Roy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Thank you Avri!!  I had projected that this would happen during our working group discussions, but the non-NCUC members disagreed with me.
>>> Somehow good human rights standards pointed in a different direction.
>>>
>>> Roy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:30 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Fwd: [] EU, RAA, and privacy
>>>
>>> From another list.
>>> Forwarded with permission.
>>>
>>> Seemed relevant to some of the things we have been talking about.
>>> If only all gTLD could be Swedish TLDs
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: "John Berryhill, Ph.d., Esq."
>>>> Subject: [] EU, RAA, and privacy
>>>> Date: 26 April 2013 11:55:15 EST
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The .se registry has amended their terms:
>>>>
>>>> "In the revised Registration terms concerning the top-level domain .se, which will become effective on June 3, clause 9.3 stipulates that "the registry of Domain names maintained by the Foundation is made available on the Internet through a domain-name search service (WHOIS). If the Domain holder is a physical person or a sole trader, no personal details will be published in this manner, unless specifically requested by the Domain holder."
>>>>
>>>> Someone had mentioned this earlier on the list, so I made an audio excerpt of the developing EU multiple personality disorder on WHOIS and data protection, and posted it to http://www.johnberryhill.com/eu-privacy-for-us.mp3
>>>>
>>>> The audio clip is a statement from the EU rep at the Beijing GAC/Board meeting, expressing his gratitude that everyone else in the world will be flagged, tagged, and bagged, but EU registrars will be able to claim a carve-out from the provisions of the new RAA.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> John Berryhill, Ph.d. Esq.
>>>
> 


-- 
Grigori Saghyan
PGP Key ID: 0x48E4D5DC



ATOM RSS1 RSS2