NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joly MacFie <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Joly MacFie <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:33:44 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Like many from the technical community, I also believe that .xxx or
> .sex is a bad idea, (see RFC3675:
> https://www3.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3675.txt),


That paper talks about compulsory segregation, which I don't think
anyone is presently talking about wrt .xxx.

I note its thorough endorsement of the PICS standard in Section 4.3.
I've never understood why that didn't catch on more widely.

j


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  917 442 8665 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
---------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2