Hi,

I do not wish to run for NCUC leadership spot.  Though I would love to see more candidates, with more diversity and some dialogue about candidates and voter's perspectives about what the NCUC should function like.  This is a voting period after all, when such conversations should be ok.

I want to be an NCUC member who can ask for information and gets it, as opposed to be being treated like a rock throwing pariah for thinking there is something that needs to be spoken of.  I want to being an NCUC member to include the ability to send such questions without fear.  Not that such fear ever stopped me, but it might stop others.    In this case I asked for information backing up statements made in a campaign statement, and instead of getting an answer, even one like " ooops, I did not really do that but will in the future," I get attacked for asking questions.

I am sorry that asking questions about accountability and transparency are considered a waste of your time and bandwidth during an election.  I suggest you ignore me.  You can even add me to a kill-file.  


avri




On 23 Nov 2011, at 10:24, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> Avri, 
> This is getting silly. Please stop. 
> If you don't like the way things have been done, run for office and promise to do them differently. That would be constructive.
> Otherwise your insinuations and taunts are just wasting people's time and bandwidth. 
> 
> --MM 
> 
>> As the most visible insinuator, may I ask for URLs of where in the
>> various archived lists this is recorded? Even after stipulating that you
>> made every decision for the good of the NCUC and never in your own self
>> interest, it would be helpful to see where in the archives of the NCUC
>> and of its leadership, this is documented.
>> 
>> I respect that everybody in NCUC supports your re-election and trusts in
>> your integrity, I would just like to see the archives that back up your
>> decisions and the claim that they were all done with full consultation
>> of the EC.
>>