NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:40:29 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hi,w that the comment period has conclude the IGO-INGO group is moving
toward final report - and trying to do it very quickly.
>
> The consensus call portion of the process has begun with a bang.
>
> The note below explains the activity we are now engaged in.
>
> I have replaced the blank form Thomas provided with my best guess of a NCSG position based on many conversations we have had over the years.  But I might be wrong.


I think you are pretty much spot on....I just wonder why we are
agreeing on 2nd lvl protections when we don't agree on reserving them
in the AGB?

What have I missed?

Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2