Hi,

I do not think there is any organized effort to work on this.

If there are comments to be made, we could follow the now std process
of  starting off a drive document and collecting peoples opinions.

I personally do not have criticism of this at this time, I think they
have resolved the separability question adequately well.  Some
outstanding issues are currently being discussed in the CWG dealing with
how the membership of the Names community members of CCG are selected
and on who will be the license signer at ICANN.  But that stuff is not
part of this comment review.

I am, however, willing to help collect any discussion that comes out of
the DISCUSS list into a document for NCSG-PC consideration.

avri


On 11-Aug-16 18:02, Carlos Vera wrote:
> Is there some group working on this? Or should every individual contribute?  I guess a more reliable process would include a coolaboration efort guided for some of our organizations.
>
> Carlos Vera
> Isoc Ecuador
>
> Enviado desde mi smartphone BlackBerry 10.
>   Mensaje original  
> De: avri doria
> Enviado: jueves, 11 de agosto de 2016 16:55
> Para: [log in to unmask]
> Responder a: avri doria
> Asunto: Fwd: [] CCWG-ACCT[Announcement] Call for Public Comment on IANA IPR Agreements
>
> fyi
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] [Announcement] Call for Public Comment on IANA IPR
> Agreements
> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 19:41:29 +0000
> From: Hillary Jett <[log in to unmask]>
> To: CCWG-Accountability <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> Original link: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-08-11-en
>
>
>
>
>
> Call for Public Comment on IANA IPR Agreements
>
> Today, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Trust, the operational
> communities, and ICANN announced a call for public comment, soliciting
> feedback on draft agreements designed to address a requirement from
> the Proposal to Transition the Stewardship of the Internet Assigned
> Numbers Authority (IANA) Functions from the U.S. Commerce Department's
> National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to the
> Global Multistakeholder Community
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/iana-stewardship-transition-proposal-10mar16-en.pdf> [PDF,
> 2.3 MB]. The Proposal required that the domain names that ICANN uses to
> perform the IANA functions and the IANA trademarks (the "IANA IPR") be
> transferred to an entity independent of the IANA Functions Operator, and
> held for the benefit of the entire community.
>
> This call for public comment
> <https://www.ianacg.org/call-for-public-comment-on-iana-ipr-agreements/> seeks
> community input on three agreements concerning the IANA IPR developed by
> the community to meet this requirement from the Proposal:
>
> · IANA IPR Assignment Agreement
>
> · IANA IPR License Agreement (model)
>
> · IANA IPR Community Agreement
>
> The ICG web site is being used as a neutral site to host this call for
> public comment, but the agreements are not a product of the ICG. After
> public comment inputs are reviewed and considered, the agreements will
> be finalized. The agreements are expected to be signed upon successful
> completion of the IANA Stewardship Transition.
>
> ICANN is a party to some of the agreements posted for comment:
>
> · The IANA IPR Assignment Agreement, through which ICANN will
> transfer the IANA IPR to the IETF Trust
>
> · Three IANA IPR License Agreements, through which
> the IETF Trust will license back to ICANN the rights to use
> that IANA IPR in the performance of the IANA functions. There will be
> three IANA IPR License Agreements, so that there is one representing
> each portion of the IANA functions (naming, numbering and protocol
> parameters). The Community Agreement sets out how the naming, numbering
> and protocol parameters communities will work together with the IETF Trust.
>
> Comments are due by 12 September 2016 at 23:59 UTC. Comments should be
> submitted via email to [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>. Commenters should clearly
> reference to which of the agreement(s) their comments apply. For more
> detailed information, please
> visit https://www.ianacg.org/call-for-public-comment-on-iana-ipr-agreements/.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus