Hi Enrique

> On Oct 22, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Enrique Chaparro <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Bill, for keeping us in the loop and all others for their
> contributions.
> 
> While I agree on Avri's characterization of NCSG, i.e., that
> NCSG does not need to be a (whatever)state-sanctioned body
> to have a role and its own word on Internet-related policies,
> I have several strong objections to the wording of the document
> and would _not_support NCSG endorsing it.

The NCSG PC (on which I do not have a vote) presumably would make a decision if able based on the thrust of member inputs and its own assessment.  Re: the former, it’d be helpful to know to what bits of text you have strong objections and why….

Thanks,

Bill