NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Mueller, Milton L" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mueller, Milton L
Date:
Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:42:30 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
I agree, NCUC/NCSG are appropriate vehicles for publicizing these initiatives among civil society organizations/individuals, and many of its members may be interested in joining in, but #Internet4All does not seem to be a domain name policy issue and I think we had better stick to our basic mission.



--MM



> -----Original Message-----

> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of

> James Gannon

> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:26 PM

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign

> 

> Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure related

> campaign.

> 

> Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this may be

> more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to

> endorse?

> 

> 

> 

> 

> On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G."

> <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:

> 

> >Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also be

> >part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion.

> >


ATOM RSS1 RSS2