Hi,

Well that advice, to read the Application Guide and all of the accompanying words before cursing the new gTLD process seems like it applies to all those who are testifying against the new gTLD program.

As for what Board is annoyed by, from their elysian perspective, I would dare not speculate.

avri

On 18 Dec 2011, at 17:12, McTim wrote:

> Hi Avri,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> 
> The freedom to send a political letter to national or international leaders seems like it has to be within the list of things that are acceptable. And I would think NCUC, whose principle value seems to be Freedom of Expression would have to support this, even for opinions we don't support.
> 
> 
> Agreed, they can send out whatever letter or testimony they like.
> 
> They should however probably read the documents (DAG) carefully before they draft their testimony.
> 
> My main point was that it was a silly political blunder.  If I were on the Board, I would be pretty annoyed.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel