NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:50:36 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines)
.... a counter-proposal by the IPC to reject OPOC and do studies.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[council] Proposed Motion for draft Final Report on Whois and 
Voting in LA
Date: 	Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:36:41 -0400
From: 	Rosette, Kristina <[log in to unmask]>
To: 	<[log in to unmask]>



All,

Set forth below is a proposed motion for inclusion in the draft Final 
Report and, if seconded, to be voted upon during the LA meeting. 

Kristina

-*-

WHEREAS:
1. The GNSO Council hereby accepts the Working Group report and 
acknowledges the tremendous effort by Working Group participants and 
ICANN staff.

2. The GNSO Council does not consider the Working Group report as an 
adequate basis for any implementation of the Operational Point of 
Contact (OPOC) proposal, due to the inability to reach agreement on a 
number of key issues identified in the charter of the Working Group.

3. The GNSO Council notes that no comprehensive, objective study has yet 
been made of key factual issues regarding the Whois system, and that 
future ICANN policymaking could greatly benefit from the results of such 
a study.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The GNSO Council thanks all of the volunteers, consultants, staff and 
others who have participated in the GNSO's examination of Whois policy 
over the last four years.

2. Building on the work done in response to paragraph (c) of the GNSO 
Council Resolution #3 of September 6, 2007, the Council requests that 
ICANN staff take the necessary steps to proceed with a comprehensive, 
objective study on the issues identified by the Whois Working Group, by 
the Governmental Advisory Committee in its statement of principles on 
Whois, and by the Council. These issues include the characteristics of 
gTLD registrants, the uses and abuses of Whois data, and a review and 
analysis of the different proxy services available today. Specifically, 
the Council directs the staff to present for its review a draft Request 
for Proposals for such a study, including a proposed budget and 
timeline, and a methodology for outreach to knowledgeable parties, 
within 90 days from the date of adoption of this resolution.

3. The GNSO Council will take the results of this study, once completed, 
into account in deciding on the next steps in Whois policy development.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2