Hi,
One answer to this is that the charter was for a single CCWG with 2
phases. So the assumption is that it continues on.
Also I would think:
- that new participants from anywhere can still join anytime.
- that any SOAC organization that wishes to change its member can do so
at any time
- any group with a liaison can change its liaison
- that the 3 chairing chartering organizations could change their chair
if they want
There was one question from one of the outside advisers as to whether we
wanted to get some new specialties among the advisers
avri
On 06-Mar-16 10:25, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote:
> Dear Tapani,
>
> does this mean that the team of WS1 has nominated itself to
> automatically continue to be the formal vehicle for WS2? With the same
> gourd of members/participants? Is the CNSG going to discuss this at
> some point?
>
> Thanks
>
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> +506 8837 7176
> Skype: carlos.raulg
> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
> Forwarded message:
>
>> From: Mathieu Weill <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: CCWG Accountability <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: Implementation and Work Stream 2 role for
>> CCWG Accountability
>> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 11:15:16 +0100 (CET)
>>
>> FYI, this letter was sent in accordance with our discussions on Friday.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Mathieu
>>
>>
>>
>> De : Mathieu Weill [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Envoyé : dimanche 6 mars 2016 10:15
>> À : 'James M. Bladel'; 'Thomas Schneider'; 'Alan Greenberg'; 'Byron
>> Holland'; 'Patrik Fältström'; 'Louie Lee'; [log in to unmask]
>> Cc : 'Lise Fuhr'; 'Jonathan Robinson'; 'León Felipe Sánchez Ambía';
>> 'Thomas Rickert'; 'Mathieu Weill'; 'Theresa Swinehart'; 'Fadi Chehade';
>> 'Steve Crocker'; 'Tom Dale'; 'ACCT-Staff'; 'ICANN At-Large Staff'; 'Bart
>> Boswinkel'; 'Olof Nordling'; 'David Olive';
>> [log in to unmask]; 'Carlos Reyes'; 'Julia Charvolen';
>> 'Kimberly Carlson'; 'Julie Hedlund'
>> Objet : Implementation and Work Stream 2 role for CCWG Accountability
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Chartering Organizations,
>>
>>
>>
>> Since sending you our Work Stream 1 report on 23 February, we have
>> started
>> discussions around Work Stream 1 implementation oversight and scoping
>> for
>> Work Stream 2. In fact, this was the particular focus of our
>> Face-to-Face
>> meeting on Friday, 4 March, and will also be the focus of our working
>> session on Thursday morning.
>>
>>
>>
>> Implementation oversight role is not specifically detailed in our
>> Charter,
>> but it is the CCWG-Accountabilitys view that the groups role in
>> implementation is to ensure that the implementation is consistent
>> with the
>> Work Stream 1 report, and furthermore to provide input on the
>> implementation work when required by staff working on the
>> implementation,
>> or, if, and when necessary to bring the work back in line with the
>> intent
>> of the Work Stream 1 report.
>>
>>
>>
>> Since we expect the CCWG-Accountability to continue in its current
>> form to
>> work through Work Stream 2, the most logical option is to have the
>> working
>> group continue in its current form and with the responsibility to
>> monitor
>> the implementation and provide input where needed. Of course, this
>> responsibility would include regular updates to the Chartering
>> Organizations via the appointed members as well as consultations with
>> the
>> Chartering Organizations should issues be identified that are deemed
>> without this specific remit.
>>
>>
>>
>> We note that, as an example of precedence, while the CWG-Stewardship
>> Final
>> Proposal was submitted in June 2015, the CWG-Stewardship has remained
>> active and therefore available when needed to answer questions from the
>> ICG, or to monitor the CCWG-Accountability dependencies, and to
>> coordinate
>> with the other operational communities on shared issues such as IANA
>> intellectual property rights.
>>
>>
>>
>> As the CCWG-Accountability Charter does not specifically address
>> implementation, we would like to ensure that the CCWG-Accountabilitys
>> proposed approach in relation to implementation is not inconsistent with
>> the intent of the Chartering Organizations concerning the scope and role
>> of the CCWG-Accountability. We therefore propose to proceed to
>> oversee the
>> implementation work as described above unless there are objections from
>> one or more Chartering Organizations.
>>
>>
>>
>> We would like to emphasize that the CCWG-Accountability will remain open
>> to anyone who wishes to join, and we will welcome informed individuals
>> with relevant implementation and operational experience to join the
>> CCWG-Accountability in this next phase. We will put out a call for
>> volunteers as we frame Work Stream 2 areas. Finally, we are conscious of
>> the heavy workload the CCWG-Accountability has been for your appointed
>> members, and we would like to offer that Chartering Organizations use
>> this
>> interim phase to re-confirm member participation, and appoint new
>> replacement members if necessary.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your consideration,
>>
>>
>>
>> Leon Sanchez, Thomas Rickert, and Mathieu Weill
>>
>> CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> [log in to unmask]
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
|
