NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 7 Sep 2015 15:46:28 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
hi,

I was discussing origin, not what should be.

I think mentioning the inclusion of privacy along with the FoE and free
flow of information is a good proposal.

avri


On 07-Sep-15 12:10, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
> This is why it is important to mention it, in my view.
> Stephanie Perrin
>
> On 2015-09-07 7:17, Avri Doria wrote:
>> On 06-Sep-15 11:10, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>>> But I also think that the broader language has sufficient merit (e.g.,
>>> why not mention privacy?).
>> One of the reasons for mentioning at least FoE and open flow of
>> information is because NTIA singles these two out.  they did not mention
>> Privacy.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2