On 3 Nov 2009, at 05:06, Milton L Mueller wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> On 2 Nov 2009, at 16:39, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
>
>>> But according to the Charter it is the Constituencies that have
>>> Rights and Responsibilites
>>
>> as things are currently defined in the byLaws, that is right, it is
>> board chartered constituencies that have Nomcom and PDP rights.
>
>
> The bylaws will be amended to reflect the new GNSO reforms.
> Both the Registries and the registrars have adopted an integrated  
> stakeholder group approach.

It will be interesting to see what happens with this.  And of course  
if the NCUC and NCSG wants to take a position on it in the working  
teams we need to figure out what that position is.

One consideration is that we maintain the notion of parity between CSG  
and NCSG.  Currently CSG gets Nomcom seats based on their multiple  
constituencies, and in fact one of the constituencies gets 2  (BC for  
big biz and little biz) - so whether the designation is by  
constituency or SG it should be equal.  This is a good reasons to call  
for Nomcom representation based on SG.

a.