NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 21:28:23 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Amen, Robin. 
This is exactly right. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of Robin Gross
> Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 12:20 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] NCUC agenda => NCSG Interest Groups
> 
> I think a lot of people are more interested in working on substantive policy
> issues than in spending their time in constituency building exercises.  And if
> we tell them they have to create a constituency first, then we lose a lot of
> energy and expertise that is only concerned with the substantive policy
> issues that noncommercial users face.  I think it is important not to
> discourage those who would prefer to focus on the substantive policy issues
> by requiring them to go form a constituency.  A flexible lightweight IG can
> serve this purpose.
> 
> Robin
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2