NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:27:43 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
> On 20 Oct 2016, at 1:06 AM, Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I agree with Bill that we should try to blend questions 1 and 3 together. I would also like to know how the Board envisions the new gTLD contention set auction proceeds being spent... There's now US$240 million "reserved and earmarked until the Board determines a plan for the appropriate use of the funds through consultation with the community". So what's the plan, I wonder? We've been talking about a charter for a CCWG on this topic since at least the Marrakech meeting, maybe longer... There's a lot of cash in there now - would be great to know at a high level how new Board members envision it being allocated. 

	I think we can assume the answer to this question will be ‘the board will do what the CCWG says, and doesn’t want to pre-empt it’. So not sure this question is the best use of our board time. 

	David

ATOM RSS1 RSS2