NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Jun 2016 18:13:37 +0800
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (813 bytes) , application/pgp-signature (186 bytes)
William,

At 2016-06-03 11:13:55 +0200
William Drake <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> > On Jun 3, 2016, at 02:06, avri doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > 
> > Chatham House style (content w/o attribution)  
> 
> In true bottom up transparent community driven IGF fashion….not.

To be honest, that doesn't seem too horrible. The Chatham House rule is
there for a reason:

    Q. What are the benefits of using the Rule?

    A. It allows people to speak as individuals, and to express views
    that may not be those of their organizations, and therefore it
    encourages free discussion. People usually feel more relaxed if
    they don't have to worry about their reputation or the implications
    if they are publicly quoted.

https://www.chathamhouse.org/about/chatham-house-rule

Cheers,

--
Shane - speaking only for myself  ;)


ATOM RSS1 RSS2