NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dorothy K. Gordon" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dorothy K. Gordon
Date:
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:07:15 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
There are no guarantees about the future.  The question is what would be legal. Right now the process has me totally befuddled.  So if anyone sees clear tell me.

best

Dorothy K. Gordon
Director-General
Ghana-India Kofi Annan Centre of Excellence in ICT
Mobile: 233 265005712
Direct Line: 233 302 683579
Website: www.aiti-kace.com.gh
Encrypt Everything - https://gpgtools.org https://silentcircle.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carlos Afonso" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2015 1:32:01 PM GMT +00:00 Casablanca / Monrovia
Subject: transition IANA II

... and since I am at it, did anyone consider the guarantees to be set 
in place so that the USA government does not decide to reverse the 
process at a certain point in time, after the conclusion of the 
transition, and take it over again?

This could happen if the post-transition dynamics leads to new 
arrangements which the US government does not like, or if a change in 
the US government might lead to a full review of the process.

How secure this will be after its conclusion?

fraternal regards

--c.a.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2