NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:47:29 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
I have to agree with MM on this one, Paul's position is neither
coherent or logical.

If you are trying to bake a loaf of bread and shut the oven off
halfway through baking, you get a ruined loaf, not "half a loaf".

Perhaps Yoda said it best "There is no try, only do or not do".

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Schaefer, Brett
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Really Milton? I've been trying to stay out of this pissing match. But this is absurd:
>
> "And if you don’t like epithets, you should see the kinds of names (“dipshit” is a relatively tame example) one gets called by these people when you attempt to counter these distortions."
>
> Can't we just accept that reasonable people can have different opinions and avoid insults and innuendo?
> __________
>
>>
>
> Brett Schaefer
> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom
> Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy
> The Heritage Foundation
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
> Washington, DC 20002
> 202-608-6097
> heritage.org
>
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 6:04 PM, Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> And if you don’t like epithets, you should see the kinds of names (“dipshit” is a relatively tame example) one gets called by these people when you attempt to counter these distortions.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2