NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:50:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Milton,

I would suggest that NCSG not only give some members "the pen" to work 
on documents, but assign "a gavel" to one member who can first warn of 
deadlines, and then pound the gavel and say "document closed and sent".
Many of the nuances that are important don't really get carved in stone 
when documents are tabled and get struggled with in the ongoing 
processes. It is better to submit a more-or-less consensus document with 
a few warts to be struggled over later, than to submit no document at all.

Sam L.

On 26/02/2015 9:32 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> Well, the CWG meeting discussing the surveys was this morning. Early.
> I wasn't able to attend, so maybe someone else can tell us whether we missed the boat.
> Probably so. This is very frustrating.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2