Hi Pedro,
Great! I would urge you to create a small spinoff group to discuss -
and then report back to the full NCSG. If you issue invitations to
people involved from NCSG in the RPM WG, I'm sure they would join you.
Best, Kathy
Quoting Pedro de Perdigão Lana <[log in to unmask]>:
> Hi Kathy,
>
> This was the one specific topic that I felt should be in the general
> comments sections of the Public Comment, since it had the most relevant
> (and clearly stated) objection of the final report. I also understand the
> expansion of IP rights as one of the major concerns for non-commercial
> users in the DNS, even though data protection seems to be the biggest issue
> for the NCSG right now.
>
> I agree fully with the minority statement in Annex D, but I didn't develop
> the topic as much because I had noticed that several NCSG members seem to
> have voted with the majority. It would be fruitful to discuss this here and
> then expand the related section in our public comment.
>
> Cordially,
>
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Lawyer, OAB/PR 90.600, Faria Santos Advocacia <https://cutt.ly/RfkTFrK>
> LLM in Commercial Law at UCoimbra (PT), Researcher at GEDAI/UFPR
> <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
> Board member of Youth SIG <https://youthsig.org/> (Internet Society)
> and Creative
> Commons Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
> The information available in this email is restricted to the sender and the
> intended recipient(s).
>
>
> Em dom., 2 de mai. de 2021 às 16:29, <[log in to unmask]> escreveu:
>
>> Tomslin and Pedro,
>> Tx you for your work and I'm glad we have an extension.
>>
>> Have you had a chance to closely review *Annex D, Working Group Members'
>> Minority Statement on TMCH Final Recommendation #1*? It's Item #10 in
>> the Table of Contents.
>>
>> It is signed by two longtime members of the NCSG: Mitch Stoltz of EFF and
>> Michael Karanicolas of Yale Information Society Project. They participated
>> actively in the RPM Working Group and for them to help draft and sign a
>> Minority Statement means they are deeply concerned about the way an issue
>> was resolved.
>>
>> I note that Rebecca Tushnet is also a signatory of the Minority Statement.
>> She is a professor of international trademark law at Harvard Law School and
>> an expert in free expression and trademark law. (We heard her name
>> mentioned numerous time by the US Supreme Court in the Booking.com oral
>> argument for the arguments of her "Tushnet Brief.")
>>
>> She is an expert in intellectual property and "fair use" which examines
>> when IP is going too far and imposing on the rights of others, including
>> noncommercial speakers.
>>
>> The Minority Report reflects a disagreement in the RPM Working Group on
>> the issue of "word marks" and "design marks" in the RPM WG. Our members
>> have noted some very serious implications. *Do you want to talk to the
>> drafters/sigantories of this Minority Statement as you prepared our
>> comments? Should NCSG be echoing their concerns?*
>>
>> Best, Kathy
>>
>> Quoting Tomslin Samme-Nlar <[log in to unmask]>:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > This public comment proceeding has been extended by 21 days. There is
>> > therefore enough time now to review and make it better, if need be.
>> >
>> > Please consider reviewing the draft, which again can be found here:
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sfowGrsBgwwCieCaKpSFnpPRiFelOAxyAK0THFbj6io/edit?usp=sharing
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Tomslin
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 14:06, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <[log in to unmask]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dear members and PC,
>> >>
>> >> We have a draft comment on this proceeding which has been kindly drafted
>> >> by Pedro de Perdigão found here:
>> >>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sfowGrsBgwwCieCaKpSFnpPRiFelOAxyAK0THFbj6io/edit?usp=sharing
>> >>
>> >> Unfortunately, we have only 2 days to review/edit. So could members,
>> >> especially the PC please review?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Tomslin
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue., 13 Apr. 2021, 21:36 Tomslin Samme-Nlar, <[log in to unmask]
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Dear members,
>> >>>
>> >>> There is a running public proceeding seeking to obtain community input
>> >>> prior to the Board action on the Phase 1 final recommendations of the
>> GNSO
>> >>> Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in All gTLDs Policy
>> >>> Development Process (PDP)
>> >>>
>> >>> Please let me know off-list if you'd like to volunteer for the comment
>> >>> drafting. It'll be nice to have more than one volunteer.
>> >>>
>> >>> The comment period closes on 30 April 2021.
>> >>>
>> >>> More information on the public comment can be found here :
>> >>>
>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-rpm-pdp-phase-1-final-recommendations-2021-04-07-en
>> >>>
>> >>> A draft Google doc for the comment can be found here:
>> >>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sfowGrsBgwwCieCaKpSFnpPRiFelOAxyAK0THFbj6io/edit?usp=sharing
>> >>>
>> >>> You can find previous NCSG comments here:
>> >>>
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2021
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Tomslin
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
>>
>>
|
