NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Milan, Stefania" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milan, Stefania
Date:
Thu, 23 Mar 2017 23:12:08 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
Dear Ayden, thanks for taking care of this. I have read and enjoyed your blog post.
I have not read the report in question, and I feel a have very little ground to move any objection--so I feel also uncomfortable at supporting it unless 2/3 of the PC members approve. Does it make sense?
Anyhow thanks for your great great work! Stefania
ps and good luck with fixing laptop!!
________________________________________
Da: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> per conto di Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]>
Inviato: giovedě 23 marzo 2017 13.12.43
A: [log in to unmask]
Oggetto: Re: [DRAFT] NCSG Statement on the ALAC Review

Hi,

We need to get something out by tomorrow, as that is the deadline. I am currently laptopless with my MacBook getting its battery replaced today, so I'm stuck making edits through Google Docs on my iPhone :/ That said, I'll be working on a second draft today and refining a few of the points, as I'm not happy with the document as it stands. I have published a blog post on the Report itself which basically sums up where I stand on the Review:

http://www.internetgovernance.org/2017/03/23/re-thinking-icanns-at-large-community/

I hope this is useful.

Best wishes,

Ayden


On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:08 pm, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Ayden, any deadline or idea towards  when it will, if, submitted? I am travelling this week.

Cheers,
Martin

On 21 Mar 2017 15:52, "Ayden Férdeline" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Greetings all,

I have drafted up on Google Docs<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZgdafZs4KBENsb-Kl9GO0l_Bh4gYdQd6F-ORpZPr27s/edit?usp=sharing> some comments on behalf of the NCSG regarding the Review of the At-Large community. This is a really rough draft, and I'd welcome your feedback on what arguments should be refined, what I might have missed, or what we might want to remain silent on. I'm not happy with it at the moment, but I figured it would be better to get some words down onto paper, and we can refine this together... so please take a read of the proposed statement here<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZgdafZs4KBENsb-Kl9GO0l_Bh4gYdQd6F-ORpZPr27s/edit?usp=sharing>, with the understanding that it's definitely a work-in-progress. And please share your thoughts, either in the document itself or on this mailing list!

Comments are due in three days, so we don't have too long to get this together unfortunately. You can read the draft report here<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-31jan17-en.pdf> (PDF link) if you haven't seen it already.

A friendly note to those ALAC members who read the NCSG mailing list: this statement is a work-in-progress, it has not been endorsed yet by the NCSG Policy Committee, and it will likely change between now and the time it is submitted (if it is submitted).

Best wishes,

Ayden Férdeline
linkedin.com/in/ferdeline<http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>




The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2