NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carlos Afonso <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Carlos Afonso <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:19:18 -0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
MM, I was on travel with nearly no access to email for a week, so my
reply is a bit late. Looks OK to me, except the phrase in 2.2.2 item 1
which says "1. Political organizations whose primary purpose is to hold
government office and/or ct government officials;"

Is "ct" short for "certain"? I think we need to be especially clear
here. In Brazil all political parties are formally NGOs, for example.

frt rgds

--c.a.

Milton L Mueller wrote:
> Dear members:
> 
> Attached is the draft charter for the Noncommercial Stakeholders Group
> that some of us in the Executive Committee have been working on. 
> 
> I'd like to send this to the Board in a week or so, so if you are
> interested in the future structure of the NCSG please review it and
> voice your approval, or propose modifications. 
> 
> It tries to follow the basic framework we have been discussing, but with
> some modifications based on our post-Cairo discussions.
> 
> We've raised the threshold for constituency formation a bit; instead of
> any 5 members, the minimum level of support will be EITHER 3
> organizational + 3 individual members, OR 10 individual members. 
> 
> In order to prevent gaming the constituency structure, we've also
> imposed a limit on the number of constituencies any member can join: 3.
> 
>  
> 
> Attached as a Word doc. If there are a lot of proposed amendments and
> things get complicated I will put it into Google docs or something. 
> 
> --MM
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2