NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:52:24 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Hi Alain.  

I agree, the meeting was quite good for both the NCSG and bring all of the all of its NCU/NGO/NFP/academic&activist  participants together.

I also like the view we were able to get of how ICANN is changing and of the direction in which Fadi seems to be facing.

I also appreciated some of bits of agreement that we were able to reach with the other Non Contract Party SG.  I even appreciated the clarity with which some areas of agreement and  disagreement we have with some of the constituencies in the CSG were able to be discussed.

It was a good trip.

Of course we probably also owe this list a more comprehensive report.  Maybe our leaders can work together to produce one.

avri

On 2 Feb 2013, at 08:48, Alain Berranger wrote:

> Thanks Kathy,
> 
> It was a good meeting. For me it was about an opportunity to start some NPOC team building. Secondly, it was the very first time in my opininon that NCSG leadership came together and a climate of trust clearly set in so that from here on we will together move the non-commercial issues forward. We have a lot of work to do together, for  instance getting NGO/NFP Engagement on the same level at ICANN as Government Engagement and Business Engagement. With the NCSG getting its act together, we have removed a barrier to ICANN creating a dedicated senior post for NGO/NPF Engagement.
> Also, the LA meeting was an opportunity to reach to CSG and its Constituencies leadership and to establish perhaps that a win for one side is not always a loss for the other and that NCHP has a role to play in advancing a number of higher level debates to make ICANN stronger in the end.
> 
> Alain
> 
> On Friday, February 1, 2013, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have not yet read the attached paper, but it is a background paper that Fadi received at the World Economic Forum in Davos.  Fadi was in a meeting on user data and privacy, and found himself speaking for users (those whose data is captured). Hooray!   
> 
> A good intersessional meeting in LA.  A new experiment on having the Noncommercial and Commercial meet together for meetings on both policy issues, and administrative issues (for growth and operation of our Stakeholder and constituency groups). I hope others will comment. I found it very valuable -- and think we have a great NCSG team!
> 
> Best,
> Kathy
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2