Milton, 

these three non-commercials are not the only ones that
had a problem with the OPOC proposal.  Patrick Vande
Walle (ISOC) also had issues as did EPIC (that
disagreed with the OPoC's proposal to continue to
publish registrants' names and countries of origin). 

Additionally, legitimate criticisms of OPoC were
offered by groups such as the National Arbitration
Forum.

We shouldn't be dismissing legitimate criticisms just
because some of the commentators can be characterized
as being within the TM camp.  

What happened to the concept of an argument standing
on its merits?  The criticisms that I read in the
public comments were on target and warranted.



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091