NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:34:37 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Kimberley Heitman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Red Cross does not need trademarks - its emblems are legally protected by
> other, better, international laws.

Will NPOC be invalided if new NCSG charter is approved?
(https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?ncsg_charter_board_issue_resolution)

2.2. Membership

a) vests primary unit of authority (including Council representation)
only via direct SG-wide voting.

2.2.1. Eligible organizations.

b) explicit requirement to be non-profit serving only non-profit
motives and activities

2.2.2. Ineligible organizations.

c) IPC interests are already being served elsewhere within ICANN

I submit that Board rushing with NPOC approval will then terribly
fragment NCSG, negating our recent years exponential membership base
growth and irreparably harm Non Commercial Interests on the internet,
worldwide.

regards,

Alex

ATOM RSS1 RSS2