NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
"Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:58:37 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Bill 
 
this older document from September 2006 is identical with the Annex A of the JPA. Interestingly it was adopted first by the Board and three days later annexed to the JPA. So my question on the governance list was: Is the new "AOC"  (Affirmation of Commitments) something like an "enhanced Annex A of the JPA" which would open some interessting room for interpretation with regard to change and continuitiy. :-)))
 
wolfgang 

________________________________

Von: Non-Commercial User Constituency im Auftrag von William Drake
Gesendet: Fr 25.09.2009 07:45
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: Is this ICANN's new arrangement with the US Government?


I should never post over my first morning coffee.  The link I mentioned below is a couple years old, sorry. 

On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:38 AM, William Drake wrote:



	On Sep 24, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Konstantinos Komaitis wrote:


		http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14517430
		


	In broad terms, seems like it.

	Just noticed this somewhat more elaborate list, posted today

	http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/responsibilities-affirmation-28sep06.htm

	Given all the reporting and leaking, I wish NTIA would just put the four pager out there and let the games begin...

	Bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2