LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Independent Objector Weighs In on "closed/private" tlds
From:	McTim <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	McTim <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:22:33 -0400
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (23 lines)

HI Robin,

It is not surprising to me that the IO will object to any "closed"
gTLD  just becasue they are "closed".

However, the last line contains a bit of a shocker:

"The objections I have just filed are based on such assessments."

Which applications has he objected to?  anyone know?

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> http://www.independent-objector-newgtlds.org/english-version/the-issue-of-closed-generic-gtlds/



-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU