NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: [Fwd: Re: [council] commercial and contractual constituencies meddling in structure of noncommercial group is unacceptable]
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:59:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
My understanding was that Avri was proposing a WG that included one representative from each constituency, which of course includes NCUC. We still don't like that, of course, for the stated reasons, but in proposing that Avri thought she was responding to the lnguage of the Board resolution. Fortunately a Board member has clarified that an all-GNSO WG was not what was contemplated by the Board. 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [mailto:NCUC-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 4:36 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [Fwd: Re: [council] commercial and contractual
> constituencies meddling in structure of noncommercial group is
> unacceptable]
> 
> I responded to Robin's message where she indicated I was excluding NCUC
> from the possible discussions on constituencies from an account that did
> not have permission to post on the NCUC list.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2