NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ron Wickersham <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ron Wickersham <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:28:03 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (31 lines)
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Andrew A. Adams wrote:

> All,
>
> For me, the key question is not necessarily whether an organisation is
> non-profit or non-commercial in its main activities, but whether its interest
> in the domain name space is primarily commercially-oriented or
> non-commercially oriented.

i concurr with Andrew's criteria above.  i represent one legally qualified
non-profit organization formally, and a few informally, yet am employed at
a small business and represent their interest in the domain name space.

i should like to point out that a small commercial organization is almost
perfectly aligned with non-commercial organizations concerns, while
having essentially no resonance at all with large commercial organizations
or large non-profit organizations.

the point Andrew raises to discriminate on the orientation of the 
organization or individual according to its/his/her interests in the NCSG
would allow participation of a larger slice of the Internet community to
voice in concert working together.

i'm resigned to the fact that the words non-commercial and commercial have
been chosen to divide into groups, yet in retrospect feel that small and
large would fit better.  is it beyond consideration to make NCSG accepting
of small commercial organizations in addition to individuals, small non-
profit organizations and large non-profit organizations?

-ron

ATOM RSS1 RSS2