NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:37:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
+1
Stephanie P

On 2016-03-18 6:19, Desiree wrote:
> +1
>
> Desiree
> --
> On 18 Mar 2016, at 09:05, Wendy Seltzer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I support endorsing the IAB comment.
>>
>> --Wendy
>>
>> On 03/17/2016 01:53 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>>> Hi James, thanks for the clarifications you provided.
>>>
>>> Based on this information and considering the little time we have, the
>>> question seems to be: should NCSG endorse IAB's comment on RDAP? It would
>>> be great if our members, specially those in our policy committee, could
>>> share their views on the next hours.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Marília
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100
>>>> Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the
>>>>> technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts that
>>>>> matter to us.
>>>> Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Shane
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2