NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Carlos A. Afonso" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Carlos A. Afonso
Date:
Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:45:21 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
Me too!

--c.a.

On 09/27/2012 10:14 AM, Brenden Kuerbis wrote:
> I support this statement, thanks Avri.
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Brenden Kuerbis
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> The IOC/IFRC is claiming consensus on its proposal to suggest a temporary
>> registration block for the IOC and IFRC. This is the statement I propose be
>> added to the statement indicating the disagreement of the NCSG with that
>> proposal.
>>
>> I request that the NCSG-PC endorse this statement.
>>
>> -----
>>
>> The NCSG rejects the 3b "temporary registration block." defined in
>> IOC/IFRC Drafting Team' recommendation for a number of reasons:
>>
>> 1. Policy recommendations from the GNSO on reserved names can only be made
>> by a PDP that is properly constituted and is run according to the process
>> rules as established in the ICANN by-laws.
>>
>> 2. This drafting team continues to circumvent proper process by attempting
>> to make policy as opposed to performing its proper function of fact
>> gathering and presenting information to the council that can be used in
>> deciding on the viability and charter for such a PDP.
>>
>> The NCSG supports the PDP only on the condition that among the possible
>> outcomes is the current status quo, no protection at the second level. We
>> support the PDP as the only appropriate place to resolve this proposal
>> among competing proposals. We believe it is illegitimate to change reserved
>> name policy,,,,, no matter how it is euphemistically named, before the PDP
>> runs its course.
>>
>> The NCSG is also aware of other types of humanitarian organization that
>> also demand these privileges and we feel that any discussion on granting
>> such special reservations must include a full discussion of all who request
>> such reservations.
>>
>> Finally the NCSG does not believe that the reserved name list can be used
>> solely for the purpose of new gTLDs, and that any decisions on adding names
>> to the reserved list must take incumbent registries into account.
>>
>>
>> ------
>> Avri Doria
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncu-exec mailing list
>> [log in to unmask]
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ncu-exec
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncu-exec mailing list
> [log in to unmask]
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ncu-exec
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2